Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ina Raymundo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep (nominator withdrawal due to addition of sufficient information and notability). —>εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 06:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ina Raymundo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable reference, little content, more likely to be promotional. Does not meet the notability guideline. —>εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 15:59, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep quite an established actress, but pre-internet. Please see Google News (archives) results, which does show notability quite easily.-- Obsidi♠n Soul 00:37, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I expanded the article a bit to pass WP:CSD#A7, WP:ENTERTAINER, and WP:GNG. I agree with the problem of sourcing for pre-Interent Filipino biography articles. --Bluemask (talk) 02:43, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep per improvements made since nomination for this new article tagged for speedy[1] minutes after it was created by an editor who was later blocked as a sockpuppet. Ouch. That issue now behind us, I offer BIG kudos to User:Bluemask for his diligence in addressing the unfortunate systemic bias toward a pre-internet, non-English star, and would ask the the nominator now consider a withdrawal. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:59, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It seems like the article is now sufficient. Thanks go to Bluemask for his expansion. —>εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 06:12, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.